National Data Archive
Data Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / FRESH-82394-EN
central

57. Approval Workflow + Status Management

Albania, 2000 - 3000
Reference ID
FReSH-82394-en
Producer(s)
PI;NUM 1
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Study website Interactive tools
Created on
Jul 14, 2026
Last modified
Jul 15, 2026
Page views
6
  • Study Description
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Study authorization
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Study activities
  • Data Access
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    FReSH-82394-en

    Title
    1. Approval Workflow + Status Management
    Country
    Name Country code
    Albania al
    Abstract

    We are experiencing a real problem with the display and approval of records submitted for publication. Let me explain using the example of record FRESH-PEF60139. We received an email indicating that changes were made to this record by user Laurent BERTOLETTI. However, this record does not appear in the Admin Dashboard as “Pending Publication” but is shown as already published, with an archived version and a draft version.
    First problem: The entries submitted for publication by contributors are not displayed as "pending approval" in the BO.
    Next, when I look at the content of the published version of this same entry, I see that it contains the changes made without having been approved by us (as evidenced by the “Summary” field, which does not comply with our approval rules).
    Second problem: records are published in the catalog without going through the admin validation process.
    Specifically, no records in the BO appear as "pending validation," even though the dashboard indicates that 5 records have this status. However, when exporting the records as JSON from the catalog and via the API, there are indeed 5 records with this status—as shown in the "status" field—but they are not visible in the BO. Upon further investigation, we find a second field in these records related to the “IsImported” status, which is not present in the files sent on 02/18, nor in the model, nor added by Nada. Information regarding the import of a record should be in the “status” field, whose controlled vocabulary includes the “Imported” value. Third problem: records with the “pending validation” status are nevertheless published in the catalog and appear with the “published” status.
    Fourth issue: A field named "FReSH" was added to the model without notifying us or explaining its purpose, and it overrides the "status" field—which is the one we had defined in the model.

    Kind of Data

    ['Paraclinical data (non-biological)']

    Unit of Analysis

    Individus

    Scope

    Topics
    Topic Vocabulary
    Socio-demographic and economic determinants health determinant

    Coverage

    Universe

    {
    "level_sex_clusion_I": [
    {
    "concept": {
    "vocab": "MeSH",
    "vocabURI": "D005260"
    },
    "value": "Female"
    },
    {
    "concept": {
    "vocab": "MeSH",
    "vocabURI": "D008297"
    },
    "value": "Male"
    }
    ],
    "level_age_clusion_I": [
    {
    "concept": {
    "vocab": "MeSH",
    "vocabURI": "D055815"
    },
    "value": "Young Adult (19 to 24 years)"
    },
    {
    "concept": {
    "vocab": "MeSH",
    "vocabURI": "D000328"
    },
    "value": "Adult (25 to 44 years)"
    },
    {
    "concept": {
    "vocab": "MeSH",
    "vocabURI": "D008875"
    },
    "value": "Middle Aged (45 to 64 years)"
    }
    ],
    "level_type_clusion_I": "General population",
    "level_type_clusion_other": "",
    "clusion_I": "",
    "clusion_E": ""
    }

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    PI;NUM 1
    Producers
    Name Role
    ARS OCCITANIE sponsor
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    ASS OBSERVATOIRE DE LA VIE ETUDIANTE
    Other Identifications/Acknowledgments
    Name
    ;

    Study authorization

    Agency
    Agency name
    ANSM

    Sampling

    Sample frame

    Unit Type

    ['Administrative database (employees, pupils, students, etc.)']

    Sampling Procedure

    ['{"concept":{"vocab":"CESSDA","vocabURI":"TotalUniverseCompleteEnumeration"},"value":"Complete enumeration (including consecutive recruitment)"}']

    Survey instrument

    Methodology notes

    Observational Study

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End
    2000-02-12 3000-01-01
    Time Method

    Prospective longitudinal

    Frequency of Data Collection

    weekly

    Mode of data collection
    • {"concept":{"vocab":"CESSDA","vocabURI":"Recording"},"value":"Recording (audio, video, electrophysiological, imaging)"}

    Study activities

    Study activities
    Study activities
    Type
    primary evaluation
    Description
    eeee
    Study activities
    Type
    secondary evaluation

    Data Access

    Access authority
    Name Email
    pp;NN pp.nn@impactgroup.tech
    Special Permissions
    Indicate if special permissions are required to access a resource
    No

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Email
    pp;NN contact@impactgroup.tech

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    FReSH-82394-en

    Producers
    Name
    Walma GHARBI
    Back to Catalog
    National Data Archive

    © National Data Archive, All Rights Reserved.